Email Communication for Building Projects December

Return to Previous Page

December 6, 2020

—– Forwarded Message —–
From: tomleonti <tomleonti@frontier.com>
To: don@northstarone.com <don@northstarone.com>
Cc: pleinenweber@sc.rr.com <pleinenweber@sc.rr.com>; Stephanie Baron <sbaron621@gmail.com>; Chris Millar <cmillar@litustolet.com>
Sent: Sunday, December 6, 2020, 06:41:19 PM EST
Subject: SH Concerns

Don,

I am addressing this email to you as the current South Hampton BOD President.

As you know my email dated September 15, 2020 to Chris Millar and copy to Doug Millar, Yourself, Stephanie Baron and Sue Leinenweber asking for clarification regarding the Structural Waterproofing update has gone unanswered.  This continued lack of communication from You and our Management Company is very troubling and concerning.  You know the biggest concern expressed at each of the Annual Homeowner’s meetings in the past few years has been the lack of communication from the board.  The lack of communication continues and is inexcusable.  Dave Puckett tried to help improve communication by creating a quarterly newsletter.  This communication tool seems to have abruptly stopped when you took over the president’s position.  The discontinuation of this newsletter seems awfully coincidental that it aligns with our building projects problems.

When I sent my first email concerning the summons letter, I believed we were dealing with an issue regarding a $101,975.62 payment to Structural Waterproofing.  Then the Mechanics’ Lien was placed on all homeowner’s properties.  This gave me pause as it did not make sense why Oak City Law would have to take this action over such a small amount as compared to the over-all project costs.  After talking to attorneys involved, and learning how many attorneys are involved, and getting paid, it was obvious something much bigger is at the core of all this.  And I was miffed at learning you hired an attorney to represent the homeowners without informing the homeowners of such.  Since each homeowner is named individually, each owner must agree to having this attorney represent them.

We continued to do our own investigating and just recently found a document sent from Lynn Edmonds of  Litus* To Let to a realtor/closing law office that has some very disturbing information regarding a special assessment on the units of South Hampton that will begin in January 2021.  This document is titled “South Hampton Property Owners Association, Inc. Certificate of Assessment.  It states the regular assessment of $717.00 will be raised to $721.00.  This is not concerning to me.  What is concerning is what comes next:

Special Assessment – 2 options, beginning 2021
Payment in full due $11,543.38
Monthly payments (60) due $192.39

This is obviously for a 2-bedroom unit in the closing process and I’m sure the 3-bedroom units will have a proportional increase.  It goes on to say; “Special assessment approved by BOD in late November to replenish funds for piping project and waterproofing.  Assessment due beginning in January 2021”.

I am making the assumption that 3-bedroom units will be assessed at ~20% higher than the 2-bedroom units (based on our regular assessments are 19.9% higher for the 3 bedroom units)

Here are the costs of this assessment based on my calculations:

$11,543 for 72 2-bedroom units = $831,096
$13,851 for 72 3-bedroom units = $997,272
Total assessment = $1,828,368

At the May 2019 Annual Homeowners Meeting you stated we had enough money to pay for the piping project and the building project with a modest ($500k – $600k) shortfall that would be covered with a short-term bridge loan.  You also said the bridge loan would be paid out of our regular assessment funds in less than a year.  The document I am referencing clearly states something very different from what you told the homeowners.  This document states the assessment is to replenish the piping project and waterproofing.

It’s not too hard to determine there is something seriously wrong when you are imposing a special assessment in an amount that is very close to the original budget of the 2 projects, especially when you are on record of stating in the annual meeting that there would be no need for an assessment to pay for the projects.  This tells me that the $101,975 due to Structural Waterproofing and the liens on our property pales in comparison to something much bigger.  It is becoming clearer to me that we owe much more money.  I am guessing it is to Tribune for over runs, our contracted engineer, and now increasing attorney fees, not to mention the mess we have regarding the units with storm shutters.  I am concerned that the bridge loan is not being paid per your plan communicated to us at the annual meeting and if true, are we at risk of defaulting?  I am asking for a detailed explanation as to what is really going on.

As for the special assessment, there are very clear requirements set forth in our Master Deed.  I have attached below 4.7 and 4.8 for your review and comment, although I am sure you are already aware of what it says.  The Board can only approve a special assessment not to exceed 10% of the prior year budget.  In this case the board can only approve ~$140,000.  The document I am referencing above states; “Special assessment approved by BOD in late November”.  To place a special assessment in the amount of ~$1.8M, there must be a vote by the homeowners and it needs 51% homeowner’s approval.  This document seems to be in violation of our Master Deed, not to mention ethicality of how this is all being handled.

4.7 Special Assessments. In addition to the HOA regular assessments authorized by this Article, the HOA may levy, at any time and from time to time, upon affirmative vote of a majority of the Board of Directors of the HOA, a special assessment in an amount up to ten (10) percent of the prior years budget, payable over such period as the HOA may determine, for the purpose of defraying, in whole or in part, the costs of any construction or reconstruction, unexpected repair or replacement of the Project or any part thereof, or for any other expenses incurred or to be incurred as provided in this Master Deed (including without limitation HOA expenses). Such special assessments, if any, shall be included within any and all references to HOA Assessments. This Section shall not be construed as an independent source of authority for the HOA to incur expenses but shall be construed to prescribe the manner of assessing for expenses authorized by other sections or Articles hereof. Any amounts assessed pursuant hereto shall be assessed to Co-Owners in proportion to their respective Percentage Interests. Notice in writing of the amount of such special assessments and the time for payment thereof shall be given promptly to the Co-Owners; no payment shall be due less than fifteen (15) days after such notice shall have been given. All unpaid portions of any special assessment shall incur a late charge of $25.00 per month or any portion of any month (or at such lesser rate equal to the maximum interest rate allowed by the applicable law) from the date such portions become due until paid. All funds received from assessments under this Section shall be part of HOA funds.

4.8 Additional Special Assessments. In addition to the HOA regular assessments authorized by this Article, the HOA may levy, at any time and from time to time, upon affirmative vote of at least fifty-one (51%) of the total votes of the HOA, special assessments, payable over such period as the HOA may determine, for the purpose of defraying, in whole or in part, the costs of any construction or reconstruction, unexpected repair or replacement of the Project or any part thereof, or for any other expenses incurred or to be incurred as provided in this Master Deed (including without limitation HOA expenses). Such special assessments, if any, shall be included within any and all references to HOA Assessments. This Section shall not be construed as an independent source of authority for the HOA to incur expenses but shall be construed to prescribe the manner of assessing for expenses authorized by other sections or Articles hereof. Any amounts assessed pursuant hereto shall be assessed to Co-Owners in proportion to their respective Percentage Interests. Notice in writing of the amount of such special assessments and the time for payment thereof shall be given promptly to the Co-Owners; no payment shall be due less than fifteen (15) days after such notice shall have been given. All unpaid portions of any special assessment shall incur a late charge of $25.00 per month or* any portion of any month (or at such lesser rate equal to the maximum interest rate allowed by the applicable law) from the date such portions become due until paid. All funds received from assessments under this Section shall be part of HOA funds.

All this tells me why there has been very little and inaccurate information shared with the homeowners.  Your decision to go underground does not go unnoticed by many homeowners and this puts you and our management company in a precarious situation where you have lost respect, trust, and confidence from homeowners.

Many homeowners are ready to take actions towards your removal from the board and possibly the removal of the entire board if that is what is needed.

I am expecting a timely response to this email as there is a time sensitive matter concerning the January 2021 special assessment that I believe exceeds the Board’s approval limits for such an assessment.

Best Regards,
Tom Leonti

No Response to This Email from Don Matheson

December 10, 2020

Don Matheson’s Assessment Page 1   Page 2

December 11, 2020

—– Forwarded Message —–
From: Chris Millar <cmillar@litustolet.com>
To: tomleonti <tomleonti@frontier.com>; don@northstarone.com <don@northstarone.com>
Cc: pleinenweber@sc.rr.com <pleinenweber@sc.rr.com>; Stephanie Baron <sbaron621@gmail.com>; Lynn Edmonds <ledmonds@litustolet.com>; Bud Fisher <jrfisher111@comcast.net>
Sent: Friday, December 11, 2020, 03:18:32 PM EST
Subject: RE: SH Concerns

Tom,
Thank you for your email and opinions shared on Sunday.

Attached is a letter regarding those comments from the Clemmons Law Firm for your files. 

You by now have gotten the email bulletin sent to all owners about these subjects as well, so many of the items below have been addressed. 

Finally, we wanted to make clear the newsletter was facilitated by Don and this Board and only stopped because of the editors lack of producing said newsletter.

Best regards,

Chris Millar
LITUS* To Let
843-448-9000 ext. 114

December 20, 2020

—– Forwarded Message —–
From: tomleonti <tomleonti@frontier.com>
To: Chris Millar <cmillar@litustolet.com>
Cc: don@northstarone.com <don@northstarone.com>; Stephanie Baron <sbaron621@gmail.com>; pleinenweber@sc.rr.com <pleinenweber@sc.rr.com>; Bud Fisher <jrfisher111@comcast.net>; Lynn Edmonds <ledmonds@litustolet.com>
Sent: Sunday, December 20, 2020, 02:22:23 PM EST
Subject: Re: SH Concerns

Chris,
Thank you for the response.  I am curious as to why you and the Board found my email to be so concerning that you needed to have an attorney review it and craft the response to yourself?

Who made the decision to engage Mrs. McAllister and what were her fees to do this work?

If the HOA is paying Clemmons Law Firm to respond to a homeowner’s email, I would say this is an inappropriate use of the HOA funds.    

Owners Legal Counsel

It appears Mrs. McAllister is going on record to distance herself from having any knowledge of Mr. Jordan’s actions.  Mrs. McAllister said, “It is my understanding that owners were notified and were given the option to obtain their own legal counsel.”  I am sure you and the Board Members know we have yet to be notified by the HOA, our Management Co, or Mr. Jordan regarding being represented.  I am the one that discovered the owners were being represented during a conversation with Ms. Trautman on September 16, 2020.  Ms. Trautman told me the owners have legal counsel and she gave me Mrs. McAllister’s contact information.  I contacted Mrs. McAllister and she confirmed Mr. Jordan is representing the owners.  I contacted Mr. Jordan and he confirmed he was representing the owners and he was retained and being paid by the HOA.  I asked him the question regarding the need to obtain consent from each homeowner and he agreed that was required.  He then told me he was working on a letter to send out to obtain consent and inform them they could retain their own legal counsel if they choose.  The letter never went out as I have yet to hear from an owner that received the letter.  I agree with Mrs. McAllister that most owners are pleased to have the HOA obtain counsel to protect us until this matter is resolved.  The issue here is again a complete lack of communication to the owners and the fact Mr. Jordan is not following proper legal protocol in receiving consent from each owner before he submitted documents with our names to the court.  

Special Assessment Protocol and SC Code 33-31-303.  Emergency Powers

Mrs. McAllister is defending the Board’s approval process for the special assessment that is in excess of their authority as documented in our Master Deed by quoting SC Code § 33-31-303 (2012) Emergency Powers. 

This code states:
(a)    In anticipation of or during an emergency defined in subsection (d), the board of directors of a corporation may:

Sub section (d) states:
An emergency exists for purposes of this section if a quorum of the corporation’s directors cannot readily be assembled because of some catastrophic event

What was the catastrophic event that occurred to support the decision by the board to not follow the Master Deed for passing a special assessment?

What was the date of this catastrophic event?

If you are going to point to (c), see my questions below (c)

(1) modify lines of succession to accommodate the incapacity of any director, officer, employee, or agent; and
(2) relocate the principal office, designate alternative principal offices or regional offices, or authorize the officer to do so.

(b) During an emergency defined in subsection (d), unless emergency bylaws provide otherwise

(1) notice of a meeting of the board of directors need be given only to those directors it is practicable to reach and may be given in any practicable manner, including by publication and radio; and
(2) one or more officers of the corporation present at a meeting of the board of directors may be deemed to be directors for the meeting, in order of rank and within the same rank in order of seniority, as necessary to achieve a quorum.

(c) Corporate action taken in good faith during an emergency under this section to further the ordinary affairs of the corporation:

What was the emergency that caused the Board to use this code vs following the Master Deed protocol?
 
What was the date the Board was aware of this emergency?
 
What was the date the Board voted on declaring this an emergency and voted on using this code vs following the Master Deed protocol?
 
Who determined it was an emergency?
 

What subject matter expert confirmed this qualified as an emergency?

(1) binds the corporation; and
(2) may not be used to impose liability on a corporate director, officer, employee, or agent.

(d) An emergency exists for purposes of this section if a quorum of the corporation’s directors cannot readily be assembled because of some catastrophic event.
(e) Corporate action taken in good faith under this section to further the affairs of the corporation during an emergency binds the corporation. A corporate director, officer, employee, or agent is not liable for deviation from normal procedures if the conduct was authorized by emergency powers provided in this chapter.

Special Assessment Calculations

I need you to clarify the amount for the special assessment.  Mrs. McAllister said it appears I am mistaken with numbers presented if I have determined the special assessment will be ~$1,800,000.  She goes on to say my numbers are incorrect according to numerical information provided ($1,316,318.57 total of loan to provide UCB payable).  I disagree with this comment as I am referring to the total amount of the special assessment.  Mrs. McAllister has referenced the loan amount; they are not one in the same.

My calculation below is updated to your current 2020 Special Assessment Calculations document sent out to all owners December 10, 2020.

2BR Total cost (one payment) $11,543.38   x 72 units = $831,123.36

3BR Total cost (one payment) $13,848.77   x   72 units = $997,111.44

Total of special assessment collected over 5 years (or less) = $1,828,234.80

Please explain why Mrs. McAllister is stating the special assessment is not $1,828,234.80?

I have a few more questions regarding the Special Assessment Calculations.  First, your document named South Hampton 2020 Special Assessment Calculations is not a calculation document, but rather an open payables document with an amount for the special assessment.  This document just adds more confusion to the rest of the confusion the Board and Management Company has caused. 

If my above calculations are correct, it appears the special assessment is higher than needed to support your Special Assessment Calculations.

My calculations follows:

= $2,507,797 total project cost with over runs

= $1,411,877 in reserve account at 1/1/2019

$20,662 interest income

$294,811 reserve deposit for 2019 (budget shows a reserve deposit of $320,000)

Why is our reserve deposit short $25,189 from budget?

-$750,212 major repairs and tax expense in 2019

= $1,757,585 remaining amount owed ($2,507,797 – $750,212)

= $661,665 in reserve account at 12/31/2019 ($1,411,877 – $750,212)

+$320,000 reserve deposit for all of 2020 (per the budget)

= $981,665 in reserves to spend throughout 2020 for the 2 projects

-$1,757,585 remaining amount owed for entire project

= ($775,920) shortfall for entire project

Why are we assessing $1,828,234 and not the ~$800k?

It can not be because we are rebuilding the reserve fund as we are already budgeting $320,000/yr.

Either the assessment calculations are wrong or there is ~$1M in other costs, which is it?

Please explain the numbers in a logical way that aligns the costs to the special assessment.

I am assuming you had to send the bank an opinion document stating we are assessing the owners a specified amount before the bank would increase the loan amount.  Is this correct?  Who signed it?

You should understand, I am not against an assessment as I understand there were over runs.  The ongoing concern is the lack of transparency and communication from our Board and our Management Company.  You all knew there was a problem back in January – March through project management and change order approvals process.  The way the special assessment was handled appears to be intentional deception by the Board and our Management Company.  An assessment calculation document that clearly makes no sense with the math not adding up appears to be an intentional tactic to add confusion in hopes the owners will just give up.  All I want is cooperation by you and the Board to bring clarity to all these issues so we can put this behind us and we can move on.  This is not going away until we work together for clear understanding of the process and the financials that got us to where we are today.

Best Regards,
Tom Leonti

No Response to This Email